JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 11, 1999

T-577 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Graciela Mejia Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Der. De Peticion. Der. A La Seguridad Social. No Cancelacion De Bono Pensional Por Entidad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bono Pensional
  • Procedencia de tutela para reclamar la remisión
Derecho A La Vida
  • Remisión oportuna de bono pensional
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Controversia sobre manera de cumplir la ley en materia de bono pensional
Principio De Favorabilidad Laboral
  • Remisión de bono pensional
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Reconocimiento mientras se dirima controversia interpretativa en materia de bono pensional
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Administrativo de Pereira. En consecuencia, conceder la tutela al derecho a la vida y seguridad social de la señora Graciela Mejía Mejía.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Gobernador del Departamento de Risaralda, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de este fallo, cancele y ponga a disposición del ISS el dinero correspondiente al bono pensional necesario para el trámite que de la pensión de jubilación adelante la actora ante esa entidad.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRENSE por Secretaria General, las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.