JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 1, 2001

T-577 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Rosalba Stella Henao Gaviria Vs. Saludcoop E.P.S.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Digna Integridad Personal Salud Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud De Mamoplastia Reductora Por No Tratarse De Fines Esteticos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Cirugía de mamoplastia reductora
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo de noviembre nueve (9) de dos mil (2000), proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Penal Municipal de Medellín, que negó la protección solicitada. En su lugar CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos a una vida digna, a la integridad personal, a la salud y a la seguridad social de la señora Rosalba Stella Henao Gaviria.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a SaludCoop E.P.S que en el término de quince (15) días, contados a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, autorice y programe la cirugía que requiere Rosalba Stella Henao Gaviria.
  4. Tercero. INAPLICAR Por ser contrarios a la Constitución Política, en este caso, el artículo 28 del Decreto 806 de 1998 y la Resolución No. 5261 de 1994 que excluyeron del POS la cirugía requerida.
  5. Cuarto. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.