JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 21, 1997

T-534 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Pedro Claver Prieto

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion De Los Incapacitados Fisicos Mayores De Edad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Educación
  • Garantía estatal de acceso
  • Trato especial a limitado físico
  • Obligatoria prestación hasta los dieciocho años
Establecimiento Educativo
  • Cobertura del servicio
Educacion Del Adulto
  • Carácter prestacional para el Estado
Proceso Educativo
  • Edad como factor relevante
7 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFÍRMASE la sentencia de fecha catorce (14) de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y siete (1997), proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Villavicencio.
  2. Segundo. SOLICÍTASE a la Secretaría de Educación de Villavicencio, prestar la colaboración que requiera el actor, para que conozca las distintas alternativas educativas que le permitan continuar y culminar sus estudios.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRENSE, por al Secretaría General de la Corte, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, en la forma y para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.