JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 10, 2000

T-405 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Ludys Pilar Carrion De Valle

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago De Pension De Jubilacion Sin Haber Obtenido Respuesta. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • No constituye respuesta información suministrada al juez de tutela
  • Pronta resolución sobre reconocimiento de pensión
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del 22 de Octubre de 1999, proferido por el Juzgado Cuarenta y Seis Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de peticion, y ordenar a la Secretaria de Educacion y al Fondo de Prestaciones Sociales del Magisterio de Santa Fe de Bogota, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho horas siguientes a la notificacion de este fallo, respondan de fondo y dentro de las competencias de cada una de las entidades mencionadas, la peticion de reconocimiento de la pension de jubilacion de la senora Ludys Pilar Carrion de Valle.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.