JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 12, 2000

T-689 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Raquel Orduz Bernal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud De Pago De Cesantias Parciales. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • No constituye respuesta información suministrada al juez de tutela
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo de 10 de noviembre de 1999, proferido por la Sala Civil de Decision del Tribunal Superior de Santa Fe de Bogota. CONFIRMAR la providencia del 10 de diciembre de mil novecientos noventa y nueve (1999).
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de peticion, y ordenar al Fondo de Prestaciones Sociales del Magisterio de Santa Fe de Bogota, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de este fallo, responda de fondo la peticion de cesantias parciales de la senora Ludys Pilar Carrion de Valle.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.