JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 8, 1997

T-504 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Carmen Sofia Cañas De Solano

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Pension De Jubilacion. Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Resolución de fondo
  • Manifestación sobre trámite y proximidad de respuesta
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal de Cúcuta el día 28 de mayo del año en curso, mediante el cual denegó la tutela impetrada por CARMEN SOFIA CAÑAS DE SOLANO
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de petición. En consecuencia, se ordena a la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que, si ya no lo hubiere hecho, proceda a resolver -afirmativa o negativamente-, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente sentencia, la solicitud de pensión de jubilación de la actora.
  4. Tercero. Envíese copia de este fallo a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para lo de su cargo.
  5. Cuarto. SÚRTASE el trámite previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.