JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 16, 2000

T-717 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Ana Yolanda Tabares De Botello

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Pension Por La Conyuge De Un Docente. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución y decisión de fondo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo de 7 de diciembre de 1999, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de petición, y ordenar al Fondo de Prestaciones Sociales del Magisterio de Santa Fe de Bogotá, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este fallo, responda de fondo la petición de la señora Ana Yolanda Tabares de Botello. Igualmente la Fiduciaria la Previsora deberá agilizar los trámites que sean de su competencia y que permitan al Fondo de Prestaciones del Magisterio, responder en debida forma la solicitud de la demandante.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.