JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 23, 1996

T-403 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant William Muñoz Toledo

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. No Pago De Sumas De Dinero Por El Tesorero Municipal. Soledad-Atlantico. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Para Cumplimiento De Sentencias
  • Obligación de hacer
  • Improcedencia pago de dineros
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla y por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Soledad negando la tutela solicitada por el senor William Munoz Toledo, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia, y en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela al derecho de peticion del actor y ordenar al Tesorero Municipal de Soledad, que responda, si aun no lo ha hecho, la solicitud presentada por el peticionario en el improrrogable termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo de tutela.
  4. Segundo. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de esta sentencia al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Soledad, al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, al Tesorero Municipal de Soledad (Atlantico), y al peticionario de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.