JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 28, 1993

T-292 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Propietarios De La Parcelacion "las Palmitas"

✓
Topic · hard data
Medio De Defensa Judicial. Acto Administrativo. Peaje Y Valorizacion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por la Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, por las razones expuestas en esta Sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR a traves del la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia a la Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, a la Seccion Segunda del Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia, al Gobernador de Antioquia, al Departamento Administrativo de Valorizacion Departamental de Antioquia, al Ministro de Obras Publicas y Transporte, al Secretario General Tecnico del Ministerio de Obras Publicas y Transporte, al Alcalde del Municipio de Envigado, al Defensor del Pueblo y al abogado Alvaro Mora, apoderado de los propietarios, residentes y otros vecinos del conjunto urbanistico denominado "Urbanizacion Las Palmitas", localizado en el corregimiento del Alto de las Palmas del Municipio de Envigado (Antioquia).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.