JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 29, 1996

T-161 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Tulia Pinto Pinto

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Pago De Cesantias. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR el numeral
  4. primero. del fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  5. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga el dia 10 de noviembre de 1995.
  6. Segundo. REVOCAR el numeral
  7. segundo. del mencionado fallo y en su lugar, conceder la accion de tutela por vulneracion del derecho constitucional fundamental de peticion y, en consecuencia, ordenar al Instituto de Prevision Social de Santander, que dentro del termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contados a partir de la notificacion de esta Sentencia, resuelva la peticion presentada desde el 15 de octubre de 1993 por la senora Tulia Pinto Pinto, si para la fecha de esta decision no lo ha hecho.
  8. Tercero. COMUNIQUESE el contenido de esta decision al Juez
  9. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga, el cual notificara la sentencia de esta Corte a las partes, de conformidad con el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.