JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 9, 1996

T-517 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Alvaro Quilaguy Mongui

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pago De Salarios Y Prestaciones Sociales. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Treinta y Nueve Penal del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, D.C., por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de peticion del senor Alvaro Quilaguy Mongui, ordenando a la Caja de Prevision Social de Santafe de Bogota, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contado a partir de la notificacion, den respuesta a la solicitud de reconocimiento y pago de salarios y prestaciones sociales, causados y no percibidos, presentado por el actor, tal como se indico en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado Treinta y Nueve Penal del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota D.C., para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.