JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 22, 2000

T-1278 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Gloria Esperanza Merchan Pacheco Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Direccion Seccional De Administracion Judicial.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad Y Al Trabajo. Reconocimiento Y Pago De Cesantias Parciales. Existencia De Partida Presupuestal. Razonabilidad De La Orden De Pago. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
  • Hecho superado
Cesantias Parciales
  • Apropiación para el pago no debe implicar alteración turno de entrega
  • Reconocimiento no sujeto a disponibilidad presupuestal
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR La sentencia proferida por el juzgado Cuarenta y Siete Penal del Circuito de Bogotá, de fecha 28 de abril de 2000, que confirmó el fallo proferido el Juzgado Cuarenta y Tres Penal Municipal de Bogotá el 22 de marzo de 2000, a través del cual negó la tutela de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.