JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 12, 2000

T-1177 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Luis Hernando Bermudez Ossa Vs. Direccion De Sanidad Del Ejercito Nacional

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud. Prestacion De Servicios Medicos Quirurgicos Hospitalarios Y Farmaceuticos Para La Rehabilitacion De Lesiones Sufridas Por Causa Y Razon De La Prestacion Del Servicio Militar. . Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Continuidad en atención médica por adquirir incapacidad durante servicio militar
Servicio Militar
  • Atención médica de quien adquiere enfermedad durante su prestación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por Luis Hernando Bermudez Ossa contra la Direccion de Sanidad del Ejercito Nacional.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER al senor Luis Hernando Bermudez Ossa la tutela del derecho a la salud. En consecuencia, se ordena la Direccion de Sanidad del Ejercito Nacional que en forma inmediata proceda a prestarle los servicios medicos, quirurgicos, hospitalarios y farmaceuticos que requiera Luis Hernando Bermudez Ossa para la rehabilitacion de las lesiones que sufrio con causa y razon de la prestacion del servicio militar, mediante los centros de prestacion de servicios a su cargo.
  4. TERCERO. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 de Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.