JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 2002

T-1047 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Maria Leticia Carreño Diaz Vs. Iss Cundinamarca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Menor De Edad. Solicitud Examen No Incluido En El Pos Prescrito Por Medico Tratante Adscrito A Otra Entidad. Acreditar Falta Capacidad De Pago. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Niño
  • Práctica de examen
  • Prueba de la incapacidad económica de los padres
Derecho A La Salud
  • Presupuestos a cumplir para considerarlo fundamental
Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Presupuestos a cumplir para considerarlo fundamental
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Capacidad económica del usuario respecto de servicios no cubiertos
  • Exclusiones y limitaciones
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de agosto 6 de 2002, proferida por el Juzgado Veintiuno de Familia de Bogotá, que negó la tutela solicitada por María Leticia Carreño Díaz en representación de su menor hijo Germán Alberto Salgado Carreño contra el Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Cundinamarca y Distrito Capital.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.