JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 30, 2003

T-1024 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Rosalba Sanchez Vs. Is Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud Evaluacion Por Hematologia Prescrita Por Medico Tratante. Realizacion Examenes De Diagnostico. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Conexidad con la vida
Derecho A La Vida
  • Vulneración por no realizarse examen de diagnóstico para detectar enfermedad y determinarse el tratamiento
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Realización evaluación de hematología
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVÓCASE la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín de fecha 2 de julio de 2003, en la acción de tutela instaurada por la señora María Rosalba Sánchez, contra la - EPS Seguro Social - Regional Antioquia. En su lugar, CONCÉDASE el amparo solicitado.
  3. Segundo. En consecuencia, ORDÉNASE EPS Seguro Social - Regional Antioquia que, a más tardar, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta providencia, si no lo ha hecho autorice y realice la evaluación por HEMATOLOGIA ordenada a la señora María Rosalba Sánchez.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.