JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 21, 2002

T-1011 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luis Alberto Sierra Rubiano Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Seguridad Social Minimo Vital Salud Vida Y Adquiridos. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Inclusion En Nomina De Pensionados. Pago Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Bonos Pensionales. Cuotas Partes. Soporte Financiero. Iss.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Fundamental por conexidad
Derecho A La Pension De Jubilacion
  • Divergencias de criterio respecto a su financiación
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Término de seis meses para reconocerla
Via De Hecho
  • Retardo injustificado en reconocimiento de pensión
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Modificar la sentencia proferida el 18 de diciembre de 2001 por el Juzgado 21 Penal del Circuito y revocar la sentencia proferida el 22 de febrero de 2002 por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar al Seguro Social que en el termino de quince dias habiles profiera la resolucion correspondiente al reconocimiento de la pension de vejez del senor Luis Alberto Sierra Rubiano y que en los quince dias siguientes inicie el pago de las mesadas.
  3. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.