JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 21, 2002

T-1010 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jesus Maria Morales Valdes Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Seguridad Social Minimo Vital Salud Vida Y Adquiridos. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Inclusion En Nomina De Pensionados. Pago Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Bonos Pensionales. Cuotas Partes. Soporte Financiero. Iss.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Pension De Jubilacion
  • Retardo injustificado en su reconocimiento
  • Divergencias de criterio respecto a su financiación
Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Vulneración por retardo injustificado en reconocimiento de pensión
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida el 20 de noviembre de 2001 por el Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Laboral de Medellin y la sentencia proferida el doce de diciembre de 2001 por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de esa ciudad.
  3. Segundo. Ordenar al Seguro Social que en el termino de quince dias habiles profiera la resolucion correspondiente al reconocimiento de la pension de vejez del senor Jesus Maria Morales Valdes y que en los quince dias siguientes se inicie el pago de las mesadas.
  4. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.