JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 14, 2004

T-1004 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Ofelia Gutierrez De Isaza Vs. Corte Suprema De Justicia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Seguridad Social Y El Debido Proceso Por La Decision De La Corporación De Casar Una Sentencia Relacionada Con Una Sustitución Pensional De Ecopetrol. Carencia De Competencia Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Para El Tramite De La Accion D
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias De La Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Revisión de estas providencias corresponde a la Corte Constitucional
  • Consejo Superior de la Judicatura carece de competencia
Regimen De Seguridad Social
  • Exclusión de los trabajadores de ECOPETROL del contenido de la ley 100 de 1993
Accion De Tutela Temeraria
  • Inexistencia por rechazo demanda inicial
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmase la sentencia proferida por el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura el siete (7) de mayo de 2004, en la acción de tutela instaurada mediante apoderado por Maria Ofelia Gutiérrez de Isaza contra la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
  2. Por Secretaría General, Líbrense las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.