JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 20, 2001

T-1004 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Haimer Fernandez Morera Vs. Hospital Universitario San Jose De Popayan·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social Trabajo Y Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Salarios. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Empleador
  • Falta de presupuesto o insolvencia para pago oportuno de salarios no es razón suficiente
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal Municipal de Popayán con fecha de 14 de mayo de 2001, que negó la acción de tutela del señor Haimer Fernández Morera.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela que ha dado origen al presente fallo y ORDENAR que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas se paguen los salarios debidos al señor HAIMER FERNANDEZ MORERA, si es que ello no se ha efectuado.
  4. TERCERO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.