JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 15, 1993

T-046 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Patricia Valencia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Libertad. Habeas Corpus. Debido Proceso. Detencion Por El Ejercito Nacional. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del 16 de septiembre de 1992, proferida por la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, la cual confirmó la sentencia denegatoria de la acción de tutela presentada por la señora PATRICIA VALENCIA LOAIZA.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela solicitada y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR a la Dirección Seccional de Orden Público de Medellín el cumplimiento inmediato y efectivo de la orden de libertad impartida en favor de la peticionaria, con fundamento en lo expuesto en la presente providencia.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE comunicación a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Medellín, con miras a que se surta la notificación de esta providencia, según lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.