C-894 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Fabio Hernando Diaz Revelo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inexistencia de contenido normativo pretendido
- Ausencia de concepto de vulneración
- Requisitos mínimos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 5 de 1969.
Art. 3.
Lapsos o periodos en que se hayan devengado asignaciones por servicios prestados a la nacion por representante o diputado a la asamblea nacional constituyente.
Inhibitoria por ineptitud sustantiva de demanda.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 171/61. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- RESUELVE:
- Primero. INHIBIRSE para resolver sobre el fondo de la demanda de la referencia, por ausencia del concepto de la violación constitucional contra el artículo 3 de la Ley 5ª de 1969.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.