C-829 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
✓Claimant Ricardo Silva Betancourt
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Finalidad
- Alcance en lo académico y administrativo
- No es absoluta
- Alcance
- Desarrollo legislativo
- Fundamento
- Estatutos y régimen de alumnos y docentes
- Participación de comunidad educativa
- Alcance respecto de estudiantes, profesores o personal administrativo
- Límites
- No sustitución de la ley
- Alcance respecto de la autonomía
- Significado
- Reserva de ley
- Unificación
- Establecimiento de régimen especial por legislador
- Normas específicas
- Competencia reglamentaria interna
- Finalidad
- Consagración
- Competencia interna en materia disciplinaria
- Normas sobre deberes, derechos y prohibiciones
- Deberes específicos
- Estatutos para docentes, estudiantes y personal administrativo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 30 de 1992.
Arts. 75.
Lit.
D) y 79 (ps.).
Decreto 1210 de 1993.
Arts. 3 24 lit.
G) y 26 (ps.).
Estatuto del profesor universitario y personal administrativo.
Regimen disciplinario.
Autonomia universitaria.
Universidad estatal.
Regimen especial.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 30/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Declarar EXEQUIBLES los articulos 75, literal d), y la expresion "regimen disciplinario del personal administrativo", de la Ley 30 de 1992; y la expresion "regimen disciplinario" del articulo 26 del Decreto 1210 de 1993, en los terminos expuestos en esta sentencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.