JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 20, 1997Full bench

C-594 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella.

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec 2351/65 Arts 8 Parcial. Codigo Sustantivo Del Trabajo Art. 64 Parcial. Estabilidad En El Empleo Accion De Reintegro E Indemnizacion. Exequibles Y Ver <a Href=../1993/C-569-93.Rtf> C-569/93</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

8 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2351/65. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 6Decreto 2351/65UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 2351/65 «ordinal 5»UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 2351/65UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 2351/65UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 2351/65UPHELD
On the entire provisionLey 50/90ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. En relación el parágrafo transitorio del artículo 64 del Código Sustantivo del Trabajo, subrogado por el artículo 6º de la Ley 50 de 1990, estarse a lo resuelto en las sentencias No 115 del 26 de septiembre de 1991 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y C-569 de 1993 de la Corte Constitucional, que declararon exequible esa norma.
  2. Segundo. DECLARAR EXEQUIBLES el ordinal
  3. quinto. del artículo 8º del Decreto Ley 2351 de 1965 y el parágrafo del artículo 62 del Código Sustantivo del Trabajo, subrogado por el artículo 7º del Decreto Ley 2351 de 1965.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.