JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 7, 1995Full bench

C-592 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Orlandorengifo Callejas

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 42/93. Art. 54 Y 59 Parciales. Autonomia Presupuestal De La Contraloria. Calidades Para Ser Contralor. Exeq. E Inexeq.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contralor General De La Republica
  • Acreditar título universitario
  • Calidades
  • Acreditar título universitario específico
Derecho De Acceso A Cargos Publicos
  • Improcedencia de fijar restricciones
Gobierno
  • Facultad de formulación del presupuesto
Contraloria General De La Republica
  • Autonomía presupuestal
  • Presentación unificada del proyecto de presupuesto
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 42/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 54Ley 42/93UPHELD
Art. 59Ley 42/93STRUCK DOWN· in part
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. 1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el enunciado "para ser presentado a la Direccion General de presupuesto, quien lo incorporara al respectivo proyecto de ley de presupuesto", contenido en el articulo 54 de la Ley 42 de 1993.
  4. 2. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el enunciado "en ciencias economicas, contables, juridicas, financieras o de administracion", contenido en el articulo 59 de la Ley 42 de 1993.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
Partial dissentVladimiro Naranjo MesaPartial dissentHernando Herrera Vergara
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.