JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 15, 1998Full bench

C-499 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Julian Marulanda Calero

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 106/93. Art. 81. Naturaleza De La Auditoria De La Contraloria General De La Republica. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Auditoria De La Contraloria General De La Republica
  • Alcance del vocablo dependencia
  • Naturaleza
Control Fiscal Externo
  • Autonomía administrativa de los órganos que lo ejercen
  • Autonomía jurídica de los organismos que lo ejercen
  • Autonomía presupuestal de los organismos que lo ejercen
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 106/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 81Ley 106/93STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«adscrita al Despacho del Contralor General.»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "adscrita al Despacho del Contralor General de la Nacion" contenida en el articulo 81 de la Ley 106 de 1993.
  4. Segundo. Con la excepcion contenida en el numeral
  5. primero. de la parte resolutiva de esta providencia, declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 81 de la Ley 106 de 1993, bajo el entendido de que la expresion "dependencia" se refiere a un organo de fiscalizacion autonomo de origen constitucional.
  6. Notifiquese, cumplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.