JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 12, 1996Full bench

C-434 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Carlos Andres Gonzalez Maya

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 222/95. Arts. 43 Y 232. Regimen De Procesos Concursales. Responsabilidad Penal. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Reintegro En Materia Comercial
  • Improcedencia para revisor fiscal despedido
Principio De Unidad De Materia
  • Supuesto de inconstitucionalidad
  • Tratamiento por otras ramas del derecho
Accion De Reintegro
  • Regulación legal ordinaria
Responsabildiad Penal En Materia Comercial
  • Datos falsos sobre estados financieros
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 222/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 232Ley 222/95UPHELD
Art. 43Ley 222/95UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE, únicamente en cuanto no desconoce el principio constitucional de unidad de materia, el artículo 43 de la Ley 222 de 1995.
  2. Se condiciona la exequibilidad declarada, en el sentido de que los sujetos activos de las conductas allí previstas son única y exclusivamente los administradores, contadores y revisores fiscales de sociedades civiles o mercantiles.
  3. Segundo. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 232 de la misma Ley, en el entendido de que su aplicación no puede afectar derechos adquiridos, individuales y concretos, ya consolidados en cabeza de trabajadores.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.