C-278 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
✓Claimant Julio Antonio Rubio Cruz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Vulneración de principios constitucionales
- Alcance de la carga de especificidad
- Vicios en trámite legislativo
- Falta de especificidad en las razones de inconstitucionalidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Acto legislativo 02 de 2004.
Se reforman algunos articulos de la constitucion politica de colombia y se dictan otras disposiciones.
A juicio del demandante el cuerpo normativo acusado infringe distintas disposiciones de la constitución política de 1991.
Cosa juzgada respecto del cargo relacionado con la vulneración del principio de igualdad por parte del acto legislativo 02 de 2004.
Estarse a lo resuelto en c-1040 de 2005 e inhibida
What it decided
Holdings on Acto_legislativo 02/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C- 1040 de 2005, mediante la cual se declaro la exequibilidad del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2004, por el cargo de vulneracion del principio de igualdad.
- SEGUNDO. Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse respecto de la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2004, por vulneracion del articulo 377 constitucional y los principios de soberania popular, prevalencia del interes general y democracia participativa y pluralista, en razon a la configuracion del fenomeno de la inepta demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.