C-153 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Toro Lopez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Tratamiento dado en el Código Civil y en el Código de Comercio
- Carácter supletivo de disposiciones del Código Civil y Código de Comercio
- No vulneración por regulación diferente en Código Civil y Código de Comercio
- No violación por fijación de monto de intereses por retardo en pago de expensas al no alterar reglas civiles ni comerciales
- Operancia cuando no se ha fijado uno inferior por la Asamblea
- Naturaleza diferente de regímenes
- Régimen normativo especial
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 675 de 2001.
Art. 30 inc. 1.
Regimen de propiedad horizontal.
Contribución a expensas comunes.
Interes de mora por incumplimiento en el pago establecido por la asamblea de copropietarios.
Aplicación interes bancario corriente certificado por la superbancaria
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 675/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E:
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE, por los cargos analizados, el primer inciso del articulo 30 de la Ley 675 de 2001"por medio de la cual se expide el regimen de propiedad horizontal".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.