JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 25, 2003Full bench

C-153 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jairo Casanova Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 624 De 1989. Art. 121 (P.). Estatuto Tributario. Retencion En La Fuente. Deduccion De Gastos En El Exterior. Pago A Comisionistas Por Compra O Venta De Mercancias Materias Primas U Otros Bienes. Libertad Economica. Facultades Extraordinarias. Exeq
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Tratamiento Diferenciado
  • No vulneración de la libertad económica
  • Fin constitucionalmente valioso
  • Instrumento importante para el fomento de la producción y el aprovechamiento del conocimiento nacional
Impuesto Sobre La Renta
  • Procedimiento para establecer renta líquida gravable
Libertad De Configuracion Legislativa
  • Facultad para establecer tratamientos tributarios diferenciados
Renta Bruta
  • Gastos en el exterior deducibles sin retención en la fuente
  • Requisitos para deducción por gastos en el exterior
6 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 624/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 121Decreto 624/89UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion "Los pagos a comisionistas en el exterior por la compra o venta de mercancias, materias primas u otra clase de bienes" contenida en el literal a) del articulo 121 del Decreto 624 de 1989.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.