JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 17, 2001Full bench

C-008 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant James Fernandez Cardozo Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Autonomia Universitaria. Ratificación De Reforma Estatutaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Autonomía Universitaria
  • Alcance
  • Control de actos
  • Libertades
  • Desarrollo de postulados constitucionales
  • No es absoluta
  • Reforma estatutaria
  • Ratificación de reforma estatutaria
Institucion Universitaria
  • Adopción y reforma estatutaria
  • Ratificación de reforma estatutaria como acto de comprobación
  • Razón de ser de ratificación de reforma estatutaria
  • Vigencia de reforma estatutaria sujeta a ratificación
Institucion De Educacion Superior
  • Reconocimiento de personería jurídica
Educacion
  • Inspección y vigilancia
Institucion Universitaria Privada
  • Inspección y vigilancia
  • Ratificación de reforma estatutaria
Universidad
  • Inspección y vigilancia
7 topics · 17 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 30 de 1992.

Art. 103.

Organiza el servicio publico de educacion superior.

Notificacion de las reformas estatutarias para su ratificacion por el icfes.

Autonomia universitaria.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 30/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 103Ley 30/92UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la frase "para su ratificación", contenida en el Artículo 103 de la Ley 30 de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.