T-975 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Jaime Alberto Niño Rincón Vs. Codensa Y Otra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia excepcional
- Gozan de derechos, poderes y prerrogativas
- Sus actuaciones están sometidas al escrutinio del juez administrativo
- Su ejercicio no puede ser arbitrario
- Mecanismos de control y vigilancia por desconocimiento de normas jurídicas
- Improcedencia por existir otro medio de defensa judicial y no existir perjuicio irremediable
- Improcedencia por no configurarse perjuicio irremediable
- Garantía de derechos fundamentales
- Debe procurar la prevalencia de lo sustancial frente a lo formal
- Controversias administrativas frente a empresas de servicios públicos domiciliarios
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Cuarenta y Dos Civil del Circuito de Bogota el 21 de mayo de 2004, dentro de la accion de tutela incoada por Jaime Alberto Nino Rincon contra CODENSA S.A. ESP y la Superintendencia de Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios.
- SEGUNDO. DAR por secretaria cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.