JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 24, 1997

T-348 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Jose Jesus Sarmiento Idarraga

✓
Topic · hard data
Regimen De Seguridad Social De Los Docentes Afiliados Al Fondo De Prest. Sociales Del Magisterio. Incumplimiento Del Contrato Por I.P.S. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sistema De Seguridad Social En Salud
  • Régimen mínimo de beneficiarios en fondo de prestaciones del magisterio
Fondo Nacional De Prestaciones Sociales Del Magisterio
  • Protección a disminuidos físicos
  • Régimen de beneficiarios de servicios de salud
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Cumplimiento de contrato de prestación servicios de salud
Omision Legislativa
  • Régimen beneficiarios en salud del magisterio
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias de noviembre 21 de 1996 proferida por la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali y de enero 28 de 1997 proferida por la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y, en su lugar, RECHAZAR por improcedente la tutela impetrada.
  3. Segundo. LIBRESE comunicacion a la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali, con miras a que se surta la notificacion de esta providencia, segun lo establecido en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.