JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 23, 2002

T-018 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Marbel Luz Narvaez Bayuelo Vs. Empresa Distrital De Telecomunicaciones De Barranquilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad. Suministro Servicio Publico Domiciliario De Telefonia. Defensa De Los Usuarios En Sede De La Empresa. Instalacion Efectiva De Linea Telefonica. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Se pueden proteger por tutela
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Declárase la ocurrencia del hecho superado por cuanto la línea telefónica solicitada ya fue instalada.
  2. Segundo. Como quiera que se ha superado el hecho materia de la presente demanda de tutela, confírmase la sentencia del 10 de agosto de 2001 del Juzgado
  3. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla -pero por las razones expuestas en esta providencia-, por la cual se revocó la del Juzgado Doce Civil Municipal de Barranquilla, denegando en su lugar la demanda de tutela instaurada por MARBEL LUZ NARVÁEZ BAYUELO contra la Empresa Distrital de Telecomunicaciones E.S.P. de Barranquilla.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.