JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 22, 2005

T-967 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Saria Graciela Plata Bolaño Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida la salud y la seguridad social de afiliada que padece osteoporosis y a quien la entidad le niega el suministro de un medicamento por encontrarse excluido del pos.

Solicita se ordene el suministro del medicamento requerido.

Derecho a la salud de las personas de la tercera edad.

Limitaciones del pos en el regimen contributivo.

Procede el amparo de tutela para ordenar la entrega de un medicamento excluido del pos cuando este haya sido justificado por el medico y lo requiera un sujeto de especial protección constitucional que no cuenta con los recursos economicos para asumir su costo.

Concedida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR por las razones expuestas en este Fallo, la sentencia proferida el 27 de febrero de 2005, por la Sala Civil-Familia-Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Valledupar y en su lugar confirmar la decision del 2 de diciembre de 2004, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Laboral del Circuito de Valledupar, en cuanto ordena el restablecimiento de los derechos invocados por la senora Saria Graciela Plata Bolano.
  3. Segundo. Librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.