JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 7, 1998

T-760 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Luis Sebastian Olarte Quintero

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion. Suspension De Menor En El Colegio Por Falta De Pago. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago de pensión por estudios
Derecho A La Educación
  • Ininterrupción de estudios por no pago de pensión
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del 11 de septiembre de 1998, expedida por el Juzgado Quince de Familia de Santafe de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental a la educacion del Menor Luis Sebastian Olarte Quintero. En consecuencia se ordena al rector del Colegio San Viator, reintegrar al menor Luis Sebastian Olarte Quintero y tomar todas las medidas pertinentes y conducentes para que el accionante pueda alcanzar los logros exigidos para el grado
  3. decimo. (10deg).
  4. Tercero. ADVERTIR al padre del menor que la tutela que se otorga no lo exime de la obligacion de cancelar lo debido por concepto del servicio educativo prestado a su hijo por el Colegio San Viator.
  5. Cuarto. Librense por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.