JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 12, 2002

T-747 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Exxon Mobil De Colombia S.A. Vs. Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso Y Defensa. Via De Hecho. Ejercicio De Funciones Administrativas. Competencia Jurisdiccional Excepcional Y Condicionada A Precisas Caracteristicas. Investigacion Administrativa. Situacion De Indefension. Imposicion De Sancion Pecu
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Superintendencia
  • Si hay duda sobre la clase de funciones que ejercen debe definirse por la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
  • Ejerce funciones administrativas y excepcionalmente jurisdiccionales
Sancion Por Publicidad Engañosa
  • Conductas indebidas contra los consumidores
Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio
  • Investigación administrativa
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 3 de mayo de 2002, proferida en la tutela de la referencia, por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por el juzgador de primera instancia, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.