JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 5, 2002

T-718 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Jesus Maria Gutierrez Ojeda Vs. Acerias Paz Del Rio S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Minimo Vital Seguridad Social Y Salud. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Estado De Subordinacion O Indefension. Mora En El Pago De Aportes Por Empleador. Tutela Contra Particulares. Hechos Futuros E Inciertos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Acerias Paz Del Rio
  • No pago de aportes al ISS aunque se está devengando otra pensión
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el 12 de abril de 2002 por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Promiscuo Municipal de Nobsa (Boyaca), pero por los motivos aqui expuestos.
  3. Segundo. ADVERTIR a la empresa Acerias Paz del Rio S.A. que, en aras de evitar en el futuro la efectiva vulneracion de los derechos fundamentales del actor o de los demas trabajadores y pensionados a su cargo, en la medida en que el flujo de caja lo permita, se ponga al dia en el pago de los mencionados aportes pensionales. En su defecto, a la mayor brevedad posible debe celebrar un acuerdo de pago con el ISS y con los demas fondos de pensiones con los que tambien se encuentre en mora.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.