JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 5, 2007

T-691A de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Tarsicio Osorio Vanegas Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Frente A Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Procedencia excepcional como mecanismo transitorio para evitar un perjuicio irremediable
Acción De Tutela
  • Condiciones de procedencia excepcional para reconocimiento de pensiones
  • Improcedencia general para reconocimiento de pensiones
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la subsistencia de afiliado a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle la pension de vejez aduciendo el incumplimiento del requisito de semanas cotizadas.solicita se ordene el reconocimiento y pago de la pension de vejez.procedencia de la accion de tutela.

Existencia de otros medios de defensa judicial.

Improcedencia de la accion de tutela para ordenar el reconocimiento y pago de pensiones.

Circunstancias excepcionales para la procedencia de la accion de tutela.

En el presente caso no se acredito la afectacion de ningun derecho fundamental ni aprovecho los medios judiciales de que dispuso en su momento.

La controversia en el presente caso debe ser planteada en la jurisdiccion ordinaria laboral.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el siete (7) de marzo de 2007 por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga, Sala Laboral, por las consideraciones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.