JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 30, 2007

T-670 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Lisimaco Ramirez Montoya Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Es requisito que el tratamiento o medicamento esté determinado por el médico tratante
Derecho A La Salud
  • Instrumentos internacionales de protección
  • Fundamental
Empresas Prestadoras Del Servicio De Salud
  • Prestación del servicio de salud de manera formal y material
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida y la salud de persona pensionada de la tercera edad que padece efisema pulmonar enfermedad que debe ser controlada mediante medicamentos no pos que la entidad se niega a autorizar por cuanto el medico que los formulo no forma parte de los medicos adscritos a la entidad.solicita se ordene el suministro de los medicamentos.el derecho a la salud como derecho fundamental.

Requisitos jurisprudenciales para acceder a los servicios de salud aun cuando se encuentren excluidos del pos.

En el presente caso no se reunen los requisitos para la procedencia de la accion de tutela.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el veintidos (22) de febrero de dos mil siete (2007), por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Pereira, en el sentido de no amparar los derechos fundamentales invocados por Lisimaco Ramirez Montoya.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por secretaria General librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.