JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 4, 1998

T-638 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jaime Castro Castro

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Copias De Documentos A La Empresa De Energia De Bogota. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Prestación de servicio público
Derecho De Peticion Ante Empresa De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Obtención de copias que deben ser utilizadas con interés público y social
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Consejo de Estado proferida el 6 de agosto de 1998.
  2. Segundo. TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de petición al ciudadano JAIME CASTRO CASTRO. En consecuencia, se ordena que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de este fallo, el Gerente de la Empresa de Energía de Bogotá, responda las peticiones hechas y ordene la entrega de las copias de los documentos solicitados.
  3. Tercero. ADVERTIR al actor que el uso que haga de tales documentos será igualmente en interés público y social, so pena, en caso contrario, de las responsabilidades de ley.
  4. LÍBRENSE por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.