JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 1998

T-617 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Orejarena Colmenares

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A Obtener Copia. Tutela Contra Particulares. Solicitud De Copias De Documento A Empresa De Servicios Publicos De B/Manga. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Prestación de servicio público
Derecho De Peticion Ante Empresa Privada De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Obtención de copias
  • Improcedencia frente a terceros con intereses personales
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Consejo de Estado proferida el 21 de mayo de 1998.
  2. Segundo. TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de petición al ciudadano JORGE ENRIQUE OREJARENA COLMENARES. En consecuencia, se ordena que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de este fallo, el Gerente de las Empresas Públicas de Bucaramanga, responda las peticiones hechas y ordene la entrega de las copias de los documentos solicitados.
  3. Segundo. LÍBRENSE por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.