JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 24, 1992

T-509 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

✓Claimant Jose Ivan Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Fundamentales De Los Niños. Patria Potestad. Custodia De Los Hijos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Confirmar el fallo del Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Santa Rosa de Cabal (Risaralda), por medio del cual se negó la tutela ejercida por José Iván Gómez contra Alba Inés Villada.
  4. Segundo. La Defensoría de Familia de Dosquebradas, Centro Zonal No. 3 o al que corresponda, mantendrá la debida vigilancia sobre las menores Dora Luz y Jorge Iván a efecto de que en el futuro no corra peligro su integridad física o moral, pues, de lo contrario habrá de adoptar oportunamente las medidas que provean a corregir tal situación en desarrollo del principio del interés superior del menor.
  5. Tercero. Comuníquese a la Defensoría a que se refiere el numeral 2o. anterior, con entrega de copias de este fallo.
  6. Cuarto. Comuníquese al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Santa Rosa de Cabal (Risaralda), la presente sentencia para que sea notificada a las partes conforme a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de l991, con entrega de copia de la misma.
  7. COMUNIQUESE Y
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.