JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 3, 1998

T-467 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Dailard Hurtado Rosero Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A La Igualdad. Debido Proceso. Reconocimiento Y Pago Oportuno De Pensiones. Foncolpuertos. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Cumplimiento de sentencia laboral que reconoce un derecho
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, expediente T-171939 en tanto ordeno la inclusion en nomina del actor. Confirmarla en cuanto concedio la tutela por derecho de peticion.
  3. Segundo. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Bogota, dentro del expediente T-168720.
  4. Tercero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Bogota en el expediente T. 164423, y en su lugar negar la tutela.
  5. Cuarto. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.