JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 23, 1998

T-699 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Faraon Antonio Del Portillo Mercado Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Liquidacion Y Reajuste Pensional Foncolpuertos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reembolso de dineros por asunción de costos médicos
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de primera instancia proferida por el Tribunal Superior, Sala Laboral de Santa Marta (Magdalena) en cuanto tutelo el derecho de peticion del senor Faraon Antonio del Portillo Mercado.(Expediente T-175499).
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de segunda instancia proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogota en el expediente T-175639.
  3. Tercero. REVOCAR la sentencia de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogota dentro del expediente T-182251. En consecuencia, se ordena a Foncolpuertos, si aun no lo ha hecho, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, resuelva las peticiones elevadas por el senor Luis Eduardo Santrich Barrios.
  4. Cuarto. LIBRENSE la comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.