T-457 de 2007
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Anibal Imbachi Guaca Vs. Comfenalco
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Caso en que ha desaparecido la necesidad inmediata y preferente de proteger los derechos constitucionales del actor
- Requisitos que el Juez Constitucional debe verificar para que proceda por tutela
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Derecho al minimo vital de trabajador a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle y pagarle la incapacidad por enfermedad general aduciendo la mora del empleador.solicita se ordene el pago de la incapacidad laboral.procedencia de la accion para el reclamo de prestaciones causadas por incapacidad laboral.
La corte ha determinado que el principio de la inmediatez rige el tramite de la tutela.
En el prseente caso ha desaparecido la necesidad inmediata y preferente de proteger los detrechos del actor y no hay razon para que el juez constitucional desplace al juez ordinario.negada
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida el 5 (cinco) de enero de 2007, por el Juzgado
- Septimo. Penal Municipal de Cali, para decidir la accion de tutela promovida por Anibal Imbachi Guaca contra Comfenalco E.P.S.(Valle del Cauca).
- Segundo. Librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.