JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 29, 1994

T-429 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Elizabeth Montes Garces

✓
Topic · hard data
Injustificada Negativa Del Certificado De "no Objecion" De La Visa. Tutela Transitoria. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del 18 de mayo de 1994, proferida por el H. Consejo de Estado, Sala de los Contencioso Administrativo, Seccion Segunda.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 13 de abril de 1994, proferida por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Primera, mediante la cual se concedio la tutela solicitada.
  3. TERCERO. ADICIONAR la sentencia de dicho Tribunal en el sentido de que la tutela a que se refiere el punto anterior, queda condicionada a la circunstancia de que la peticionaria de la tutela hubiera hecho uso de la correspondiente accion contencioso administrativa dentro del plazo legal, contado a partir de la decision cuestionada (oficio 08828 del 23 de marzo de 1993), y que la medida de tutela estara vigente mientras se falle el correspondiente proceso.
  4. CUARTO. LIBRESE comunicacion al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Primera, a efecto de que se surtan las notificaciones de este fallo, conforme lo establecido en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2501 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.