JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 24, 1993

T-406 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Cesar Augusto Reales

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Seguridad Social. Servicio De Salud. Prestaciones Medico-Asistenciales Para Pensionados. I.S.S. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, con fundamento en los argumentos expuestos en esta Sentencia, pero advirtiendo al I.S.S. que debe cumplir con fundamento en el principio de la continuidad del servicio publico con sus obligaciones medico-asistenciales surgidas en virtud de un contrato interadministrativo.
  3. SEGUNDO. ENVIAR copia de la Sentencia al Fiscal General de La Nacion, al Procurador General de la Nacion y al Contralor General de la Republica para lo de su competencia .
  4. TERCERO. COMUNICAR el contenido de la sentencia al Alcalde de Barranquilla, al Juzgado
  5. Noveno. Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, al Instituto de los Seguros Sociales -Seccional Atlantico-, al Representante Legal de las Empresas Publicas Municipales de Barranquilla (en liquidacion), al Defensor del Pueblo y al peticionario de la tutela.
  6. REF: EXPEDIENTE T-15.343
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.