JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 24, 2007

T-406 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Edinora Agudelo Gallego En Representacion De Su Esposo Vs. Saludcoop

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por realización de examen médico
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud en conexidad con la vida de afiliado cotizante a quien le fue diagnosticado un tumor intramedular por lo que le fue formulada una resonancia magnetica y un gadolinio pero la entidad solo autorizo la resonancia magnetica aduciendo que el gadolinio no se encuentra incluido en el pos.solicita se ordene autorizar el gadolinio.hecho superado por la practica del examen habiendo asumido el afiliado los costos no inluidos en el pos.carencia actual de objeto

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR que existe carencia actual de objeto por presentarse un hecho superado, y por esta única razón CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal Municipal de Villavicencio el cuatro (4) de diciembre de dos mil seis (2006), en el asunto de la referencia.
  3. Segundo. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.