JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 9, 2002

T-356 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Lilia Macias Motta Vs. Hospital Erasmo Meoz De Cucuta Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago Subsidio Familiar A Menor De Edad. Ley 21 De 1982. Estatuto Organico Del Sistema General De Seguridad Social En Salud. Decreto 1298 De 1994. Comfaoriente. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Subsidio Familiar
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Accion De Tutela A Favor De Menores
  • Indefensión
  • No se requiere demostración de perjuicio irremediable
Derecho Al Subsidio Familiar
  • Fundamental por conexidad
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal de la ciudad de Cúcuta, el día 6 de diciembre de 2001, y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela a favor de la señora LILIA MACÍAS MOTTA.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a COMFAORIENTE el pago de las sumas correspondientes al Subsidio Familiar de la señora Macías Motta, por los meses comprendidos entre julio y diciembre de 2000, enero y septiembre de 2001, y los demás meses que se le haya dejado de pagar el subsidio hasta la presente fecha.
  4. TERCERO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.