JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 27, 1995

T-333 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Martha Beatriz Johnson Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Intimidad Personal Y Familiar. Imposicion A Los Copropietarios De La Afiliacion A T.V. Cable. Conjunto Residencial Montana. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCASE la sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Santafé de Bogotá, de fecha seis (6) de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994) y, en su lugar, CONCEDESE la tutela de los derechos fundamentales a la libertad y a la intimidad personal y familiar, impetrada por los demandantes contra la Asociación de Copropietarios del Conjunto Residencial Montana de esta ciudad. Por tanto, ORDENASE a la junta administradora de esta entidad aceptar el pago de las cuotas ordinarias que adeudan los actores, descontando el valor por el servicio de T.V. cable e intereses moratorios por dicho concepto. En consecuencia, se PERMITIRA la participación, con voto, de los actores, en las asambleas generales que se lleguen a realizar.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General, REMITANSE el expediente de tutela y este fallo, al Tribunal Superior de Santafé de Bogotá, para los efectos consagrados en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.